Skip to content

What’s behind the City Council’s “lack of confidence in the mayor” vote?

During 12/13 City Council meeting, Clyde Hill City Councilmembers voted unanimously on a motion that expressed a “lack of confidence in the mayor’s performance.” Councilmember Steve Friedman initially motioned for a vote of no confidence against Mayor Marianne Klaas. After debating the matter for an hour, councilmembers settled on changing the “no confidence” motion to “lack of confidence.” Not a good use of time with the city staff attending the meeting.

Councilmembers used an issue between the City Administrator and Clyde Hill police officers dating back to 2020 as the basis for their “lack of confidence” vote. It appears that – according to councilmembers – the mayor has not devoted enough city resources to handling issues. While the mayor has taken steps to resolve the ongoing issues by developing a plan and emphasizing her commitment to finding a resolution, this was not enough for them.

Councilmembers appear determined to undermine the mayor wherever possible. During the last election cycle, they attempted to drastically alter how our city is governed through Proposition 1. This asked Clyde Hill residents to hand more power to the City Council, demoting the mayor by relinquishing residents right to vote for the mayor. Instead, the city council would appoint the mayor in a council-manager form of government.

The city manager would answer to the city council – not the residents. The change of government would have removed critical check on the city council’s power, only possible through a voter-approved mayor. City councilmembers would have gained more power under Prop 1.

This last council meeting made it very clear that over 61% of voters made the right choice by voting against the change, ensuring the city council didn’t receive more power.

What’s not clear is whether the vote expressing a lack of confidence in the mayor was childish retaliation for their losing Prop 1 or a sad attempt to undermine the mayor’s credibility. Whatever the intention, the public should look past the display, evaluate the facts, and demand the council focus on solving real problems for the community as they were elected to do.

Recent News
Inflation Strains Budget – Financial Sustainability Meeting

Clyde Hill residents are encouraged to attend the upcoming Financial Sustainability Task Force Meeting on Tuesday, March 25, 2025, from 4:00 to 6:00 PM. This meeting will focus on addressing the city’s budget challenges and exploring potential solutions to ensure long-term financial stability. Key Discussion Points Building on the March 6th Financial Sustainability Open House, the Task …

City Council Chaos Continues, Community Responds at Special Meeting

Setting the StageIf you’re just tuning in, a slim majority of the Clyde Hill City Council voted in early February to defund (and effectively fire) Dean Rohla, Clyde Hill’s City Administrator. In a council-mayor form of government, city councils don’t have hiring/firing powers, and only in extreme circumstances will they take a defunding action to …

Planning Commission Seeks Resident Input on Tree Code, Lights, and Accessory Structures

The Planning Commission is inviting residents to participate in a public meeting on Thursday, February 27, 2025, at 6:00 PM. The meeting will focus on the city’s tree code, lights, and accessory structures code. This is an opportunity for residents to voice their opinions and suggestions regarding these critical local regulations that can impact your …

Stay in the know with our newsletter.